When it comes to capital gains tax, many people automatically think of property transactions. Investing in property is a significant financial decision, and many couples opt to buy property in one spouse’s name.
While this may seem straightforward, it’s essential to understand the implications, particularly regarding capital gains tax deductions. Here’s what you need to know about claiming capital gain deductions when buying property in your spouse’s name:
Understanding Capital Gains
Capital gains tax is levied on the profit earned from the sale of assets such as property. When you sell a property for more than its purchase price, the profit is considered a capital gain and is subject to taxation. However, certain deductions and exemptions may apply, reducing the taxable amount.
Analysis of Section 54
The Section 54 of the Income Tax Act provides relief from capital gains tax arising from the sale of a residential property. It allows individuals to claim exemptions if they invest the capital gains from the sale of their property in purchasing or constructing another residential property within a specified period. The key points of Section 54 include:
Exemption Eligibility: Individuals can claim exemption under Section 54 if they reinvest the capital gains from the sale of a residential property in another residential property.
Investment Timeline: The reinvestment must occur within a specified period to qualify for the exemption. Individuals can invest in a new property either one year before the sale or within two years after the sale.
Amount of Exemption: The exemption amount is proportionate to the capital gains invested in the new residential property. If the entire sale proceeds are reinvested, the entire capital gains are exempt from tax.
Conditions: To claim the exemption, individuals must fulfill certain conditions, including not owning more than one residential house, other than the new property, at the time of the sale, and not purchasing another residential house within one year before or constructing one within three years after the sale.
Difference Between Section 54 & 54F
Section 54 and Section 54F of the Income Tax Act both provide exemptions from capital gains tax on the sale of certain assets, particularly residential properties. However, they have some key differences:
Applicability:
Section 54: Applicable when an individual sells a residential property ( not any other asset ) and reinvests the capital gains in another residential property.
Section 54F: Applicable when an individual sells any asset ( not necessarily a residential property ) other than a residential house and reinvests the capital gains in a residential property.
Nature of Asset Sold:
Section 54: Applicable only when a residential property is sold.
Section 54F: Applicable when any asset ( except a residential property ) is sold.
Eligibility:
Section 54: Available to individuals and Hindu Undivided Families ( HUFs ) who sell a residential property.
Section 54F: Available to individuals and HUFs who sell any asset other than a residential property.
Investment Timeline:
Section 54: The new residential property must be purchased either one year before or within two years after the sale of the original property.
Section 54F: The new residential property must be purchased either one year before or within two years after the sale of the original asset, or constructed within three years after the sale.
Partial Investment:
Both sections allow partial reinvestment of capital gains, proportionately reducing the exemption accordingly.
Conditions:
Section 54: The taxpayer should not own more than one residential house, other than the new property, on the date of the transfer of the original asset.
Section 54F: Similar conditions apply, but it doesn’t specifically mention the ownership of residential houses.
Illustration
Let’s consider Mr. A, who sells a piece of land and earns a long-term capital gain of Rs. 50 lakhs. He decides to invest this amount in a new residential property in the name of his spouse to avail of the benefits under Section 54.
Mr. A purchases a residential flat worth Rs. 80 lakhs within two years of selling the land. The entire capital gain of Rs. 50 lakhs is reinvested in the new property. Consequently, Mr. A is eligible for a tax exemption on the entire capital gain amount of Rs. 50 lakhs, even though the property is registered under the name of his spouse.
Case related
Commissioner of Incometax-XII v.Kamal Wahal, 2013 – Delhi High Court
In the instant case, the Delhi High Court observed that according to prevailing judicial opinion, including that of the same Court, Section 54F does not require the new residential house to be purchased solely in the taxpayer’s name. In this case, the taxpayer bought the house in his wife’s name, who is not a stranger. The entire investment came from the sale proceeds, with no contribution from the taxpayer’s wife.
The taxpayer earned income from various sources, including salary and house property. In 2003, he inherited 50% of a residential property from his father. In the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008, they jointly sold the property, resulting in proportionate capital gains for the taxpayer.
Seeking to claim a deduction under Section 54F, the taxpayer reinvested the sale proceeds in a vacant plot and a residential house registered in his wife’s name. However, the assessing officer argued that Section 54F required the investment to be made in the taxpayer’s name, leading to the disallowance of the deduction. As a result, the assessing officer reduced the deduction and recalculated the capital gains. However, the high court ruled in favour of the assessee.
Simran Bagga vs ACIT – ITAT
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal made a significant ruling concerning capital gain deductions under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. In a case involving non-resident individual Simran Bagga residing in the United Arab Emirates, the ITAT held that the deduction should not be denied solely because the new property was purchased in the name of the spouse.
The bench noted that “Section 54F/54 of the Act are the beneficial provisions which should be interpreted liberally in favour of the exemption/deduction to the taxpayer and deduction should not be denied. Hence, keeping in view, the entire facts of the case, since, the sale proceeds have been duly invested in acquisition of new property within the due time allowed, the assessee is eligible for claim of deduction under Section 54F.”
Rajkumar Mandhani Chennai vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax – ITAT bench Hyderabad
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Hyderabad bench recently ruled that the tax benefit under section 54 of the Income Tax Act is permissible for an assessee who purchases a new house in the name of their spouse, even if they already own a property and receive income from it.
The case involved an assessee who bought a house in Chennai in their wife’s name and claimed deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer initially denied the claim, arguing that since the assessee already owned a property and received rental income, section 54F was not applicable.
However, the Tribunal, drawing on various judicial decisions, emphasized that the objective of granting exemption under section 54F is to encourage residential property ownership. It noted that the term “assessee” should be interpreted liberally to include legal heirs, and strict interpretation would defeat the purpose of the exemption.
In this specific case, the Tribunal highlighted that both the assessee and their wife were independent income tax assessees, and the assessee already owned a house in Kilpauk, Chennai. Therefore, the assessee’s investment in a residential house in Alagappa Nagar, Chennai, in the name of their wife, did not disqualify them from claiming exemption under section 54F of the Act.
Venkata Ramana Umareddy vs Dy. CIT, – ITAT bench Hyderabad
The Hyderabad bench of ITAT has ruled in favour of the assessee, allowing capital gain exemption under both provisions Section 54 and 54F of the Income Tax Act. The assessee sold land and a house with land and claimed exemptions under both Section 54F and Section 54 of the Income Tax Act by investing in the same residential house within the prescribed time limit.
However, the assessing officer disallowed the exemption under Section 54, arguing that the assessee needed to invest in two houses to claim exemptions under both sections.
The matter appeared before the ITAT and the bench clarified that the Sections 54 and 54F are independent provisions and do not require investment in two separate houses. Both sections allow exemption on the purchase or construction of a new residential house, and there is no prohibition against claiming exemptions under both sections if the conditions are fulfilled.
The bench viewed that “In the facts of the present case, since long term capital gain arises from sale of two distinct and separate assets viz., residential house and plot of land and the assessee has invested the entire capital gain in purchase of a new residential house, in our view, he is entitled to claim exemption both u/s 54 and 54F of the Act.”
Conclusion
In conclusion, the cases discussed above shed light on the interpretation of capital gain exemption provisions under Section 54, indicating that such exemptions can indeed be claimed for properties registered in the name of the taxpayer’s spouse.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) emphasized that Sections 54F and 54 of the Act are beneficial provisions intended to provide relief to taxpayers and should therefore be construed liberally in favour of granting exemptions and deductions. As such, denial of such exemptions should be avoided, ensuring fairness and equity in tax assessment processes.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates
