CESTAT allows CENVAT Credit Claim Citing Authorization from Importer Despite Bill of Entry not in Taxpayer’s Name [Read Order]

Considering the importer’s proper authorization, the CESTAT allows CENVAT credit despite the bill of entry was not in the appellant’s name
CESTAT-CESTAT-mumbai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CENVAT-Credit-CESTAT-Allows-CENVAT-Credit-Taxpayer-TAXSCAN

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed the CENVAT credit claim despite the bill of entry not being in the appellant’s name, citing that the importer’s authorization was deemed a valid document. Softesule Pvt. Ltd., the appellant claimed CENVAT credit for goods imported by Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.,…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹2299 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in here
taxscan-loader