Demand for Extended Period not Sustainable on no Suppression of Fact or Malafied Intention to Evade Payment of Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]

By Kalyani B. Nair - On August 23, 2023 9:30 am - 2 mins read
Demand - Extended Period - Demand for Extended Period - Sustainable - no Suppression - taxscan

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), observed that the demand for extended period not sustainable on no suppression of fact or malafied intention to evade payment of service tax. A service provider had provided ā€œBusiness Auxiliary Serviceā€ as defined in Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994 and…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
Ā  ā‚¹2299 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in here

Topics

taxscan-loader