Electronic Evidence cannot be accepted as evidence when there is failure to follow the Mandatory Procedure prescribed under Section 36B of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]

CESTAT has held that the department has failed to establish that Section 36B was complied while taking the printouts from the hard disk attains significance
By Amal Michael - On February 2, 2024 5:33 pm - 3 mins read
CESTAT - CESTAT Chennai - Electronic evidence - Mandatory procedure for electronic evidence - Customs - Excise - TAXSCAN

Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal( CESTAT ) has held that  failure to follow the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 36B of Central Excise Act, 1944, the electronic evidence cannot be accepted in evidence. The assessee, M/s.Hi-Tech was accused of indulging in evasion of Central Excise duty by suppression of production of sponge iron…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹2299 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in here

Topics

taxscan-loader