Failure of AO to Prove Nexus b/w Post- Dated Cheque and Undisclosed Income: ITAT Upholds deletion of Addition [Read Order]

The mere possession of post-dated cheques was not sufficient to substantiate the AO’s allegations of unexplained investments, particularly in the absence of any supporting documentary evidence.
AO to Prove Nexus - Post- Dated Cheque- and Undisclosed Income - ITAT - TAXSCAN1

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi upheld the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) concerning alleged undisclosed income linked to post-dated cheques (PDCs) recovered during a search. The AO had failed to establish a clear nexus between the cheques and any unaccounted income of the assessee, leading to the…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹2299 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in here
taxscan-loader