The petitioner could not participate in the personal hearing because the shop was closed on account of the metro rail work being undertaken in the vicinity of the shop
The Madras HC set aside the GST (Goods and Services Tax) proposal order on the condition of a 10% pre-deposit after the petitioner was unable to participate in the personal hearing regarding the disparity between GSTR 2A and GSTR 4 returns. The petitioner, Neelan Pharmacy and General, operates a retail trading business in medical, surgical,…
Taxscan Premium
Why should you subscribe?
- Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
- Receive Daily newsletters
- Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
- Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
- Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
₹2299 + GST for 1 year
Subscribe Now
Already Subscribed?
Login Now