Increase of Sin Taxes on Tobacco and Alcohol: Reduce Health Risk During Covid-19?

Increase - Sin Taxes - Tobacco - Alcohol-Reduce Health -Risk During Covid-19-TAXSCAN

INTRODUCTION

People of any age with certain underlying medical conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, obstructive pulmonary diseases, and obesity and diabetes, are at increased risk for severe illness and death from COVID-19.  Tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and consumption of unhealthy foods (such as sugar sweetened beverages) are three leading risk factors for the development of these chronic health conditions.

Pre-existing global health disparities, magnified during the pandemic, reflect deep-rooted inequalities in income, wealth, and voice. To address these challenges, countries need to maintain essential health services to address concurrent health needs, and particularly the needs and service delivery gaps targeting the most vulnerable populations. Urgent steps are required to prevent a secondary global health crisis, with many countries already reporting life-threatening health service disruptions. There are particular gaps with respect to maternal, infant, and child health; prevention and treatment of other infectious diseases such as TB, malaria, HIV/AIDS, and noncommunicable diseases.

Sin Taxes on Tobacco and Alcohol

India has about 270 million people aged 15 and above who consume some form of tobacco. Tobacco is a major risk factor for several chronic diseases, including cancer. According to the World Health Organisation, it accounts for 1.35 million deaths in India every year. 

Tobacco products fall in the highest GST slab of 28% as it attracts the heavy cess. The cess is paid by the centre to states to compensate for any loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of GST.

There is a cess of 65% on unmanufactured tobacco bearing a brand name while it is 160% for scented zarda. Pan masala containing gutkha is subject to a cess of 204%.

A sin tax is a tax levied on goods or services that are considered to be harmful or costly to society. The goods and services commonly include tobacco, alcohol, sugar-added drinks, and gambling. The main purposes of imposing sin taxes are to reduce the consumption of harmful goods and to increase government revenue. The consumption reduction is achieved by making the goods less affordable to consumers.

Revenuesfrom Sin Taxes

The additional government revenues from sin taxes are generally used to cover the societal costs created by the consumption of harmful goods (e.g., increased spending on healthcare to treat the diseases caused by smoking). In addition, revenues from sin taxes allow governments to implement different social programs (e.g., raise awareness of the consequences of smoking).

Sin taxes are usually imposed as value-added taxes on various goods such as alcoholic drinks and cigarettes. Sin taxes are regressive taxes. In other words, the taxes place more burden on the poorer parts of the population and less burden on the wealthier population.

Taxation of Tobacco and Alcohol during covid-19 Pandemic

Raising taxes on tobacco, in particular, can do more to reduce premature mortality than any other single health policy. The evidence across a wide range of countries shows that a 50% increase in cigarette price typically leads to a 20% decline in cigarette consumption. Lowering consumption reduces tobacco-attributable sickness and death: about half of this effect comes from current smokers quitting and the other by reducing smoking initiation among young people.

Taxing alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverages helps to reduce consumption and prevent the onset of related chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cirrhosis of the liver, obesity and diabetes. Moreover, taxing to increase the price of alcohol products, along with strict enforcement of drink-drive laws, can help reduce the high human and economic cost of road traffic injuries, fatalities, and domestic violence.  

Emerging evidence reported by the World Bank consistently identifies net positive economic impacts from sugar-sweetened beverages taxes, including overall employment and productivity gains, and increased government spending.

To help realize the benefits of pro-health tax policies, strengthened tax administration, including control of illicit tobacco and alcohol trade, play a critical function.

Even as they lower consumption and improve public health, tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverage taxes can substantially boost government revenues.  This is of critical importance during COVID-19, as policymakers must maintain their public health responses while also mobilizing domestic revenue for investment in future pandemic preparedness and other essential health services. Adoption of policies that reduce future health risks has been found to contribute to public trust, thereby helping economic activity and reducing strains on public finances. Investing in stronger health systems for all can also contribute to tackling rising poverty and inequality.

Projections presented in a World Bank Group report for the G-20 meeting in Osaka, Japan in 2019 showed that the substantial UHC financing gap in low- and lower-middle-income countries (now exacerbated by COVID-19), can be attenuated by excise tax increases on tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages. These calculations showed that a 50% increase in prices for these products could generate additional revenues of approximately $24.7 billion in 54 low- and middle-income countries by 2030.

These health tax increases would have the additional advantage of reducing future health care costs by curbing the growth of the non-communicable diseases that tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages can cause. Importantly, the revenue raised can additionally benefit poorer households when it is used progressively. Elimination of fossil fuel subsidies, which impose large fiscal costs while adding to negative environmental and health impacts, could also help expand fiscal space for health. 

CONCLUSION

Pro-health taxes are a potential tool to help alleviate the ongoing health crisis and contribute to recovery.   As such, they should be considered essential components of health and fiscal policy building support of healthier and more resilient societies.

Adoption of policies that reduce future health risks has been found to contribute to public trust, thereby helping economic activity and reducing strains on public finances. Investing in stronger health systems for all can also contribute to tackling rising poverty and inequality.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

taxscan-loader