Mere Use of Commission in Clause of Payment do not Mean Commission was Paid by Seller: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]

Use of Commission in Clause of Payment - Clause of Payment - Use of Commission - Commission was Paid by Seller - CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand - Commission - taxscan

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed service tax demand and observed that mere use of commission in clause of payment doesnot mean commission was paid by seller. The show cause notices alleged that the respondents, M/s. Sidh Designers Pvt. Ltd, who are engaged in the business…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹2299 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in here
taxscan-loader