The Union Budget 2023, presented by the Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman proposed to extend the period of limitation on the assessment orders in her budget speech.
It was proposed that an order of assessment may be passed within a period of 12 months from the end of the relevant assessment year or the financial year in which updated return is filed, as the case may be.
It was also proposed that in cases where search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 or requisition under section 132A of the Income Tax Act has been made, the period of limitation of pending assessments shall be extended by twelve months.
In the Finance Bill of 2023, it was proposed to amend the section of 153 of the Income Tax Act. In sub-section (1A), for the words ânine monthsâ, the words âtwelve monthsâ shall be substituted. It was proposed to extend the time limit to 12 months.
Additionally, the time limit for completing an assessment or reassessment, as applicable, is extended by 12 months if it is ongoing on the date that a search under Section 132 is commenced or a requisition under Section 132A is made.
In this proposal, mainly the time limit has been extended and which would be helpful for the officers to figure out the things and proceed with proper procedure.
Additionally, it was proposed to substitute “Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as the case may be,” for the phrases “Principal Commissioner or Commissioner” at both of their places.
As reported before in the case Smt. Rashidaben Taher Morawala Badri Mohalla vsThe DCIT, CITATION: 2022 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 1772, the Division Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad quashed the assessment order passed in violation of time limit under Section 153(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the JudgmentSupport our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates